Wednesday 16 April 2008

Grey goo

Stumbled upon the term "grey goo" which may have some kinda of relation to our project, took a little extract from the website.


Grey goo is a hypothetical end-of-the-world scenario involving molecular nanotechnology in which out-of-control self-replicating robots consume all living matter on Earth while building more of themselves (a scenario known as ecophagy).

The term "grey goo" is usually used in a science fiction or popular-press context. In the worst postulated scenarios (requiring large, space-capable machines), matter beyond Earth would also be turned into goo (with "goo" meaning a large mass of replicating nanomachines lacking large-scale structure, which may or may not actually appear goo-like). The disaster is posited to result from a deliberate doomsday device, or from an accidental mutation in a self-replicating nanomachine used for other purposes, but designed to operate in a natural environment.

More..

Tuesday 15 April 2008

Nano-Art?

Nanotechnology is a new type of field in science and technology and this being so new that scientists do not yet know of the limitations of nanotechnology.
The term Nano-Art is decribed as microscopically small sculptures and works of art which was one of the first uses of nanotechnology.

Nano-Bull -
The Osaka University in Japan was to build a sculpture of a bull by "
10 by 7 micrometers" (one micrometer is one-thousandth of a millimeter) which is about the same size as a red blood cell, making this micro bull is the smallest model of an animal ever created.



http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2001/08/46370


IBM Logo-
IBM immediately responded by writing 'IBM' in single atoms, using a copper sheet as a canvas. This showing off between nanotech companies has now got to the point where they are employing artists with no prior scientific training to design ever more complex art works for them.




http://www.ieee-virtual-museum.org/collection/event.php?id=3457012&lid=1

Friday 11 April 2008

A post towards Nanotechnology

I came across this article a couple of months ago, and looking back, this is very relevant to our new approach to the quote (Nanotechnology!).

Here we see exactly how the more associated scientific term, nanotechnology can be integrated in such a relevant way into today's new media.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7266187.stm

As well as being very cool, this shows us how far technology has come and potentially could go in the future. Here nanotechnology is integrated into a form of locative media, which I recently argued as a tangent to the way we are programming our absence on the move. One feature I love is its ability to be powered by grass! - Have we programmed technological life using nanotechnology?

Thursday 10 April 2008

Evolution In The Classroom

I've just come across this article on a new, so called 'Evolution machine'.

Imagine being back at school for a second, in a biology lesson to be exact. Remember swabbing invisible bacteria, and then returning a week later to witness the results? - how about if you could witness the results momentarily?

I'm not sure on the exact rapidness of this technology, but I see this is another step in backing our quote. From a physical sense, this could potentially be literally programming life.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080408085508.htm

Tuesday 4 March 2008

My thoughts on the quote

There are many ways to look at this quote. As you see here, all three of us have chosen a different approach to take. My view on the quote leads me to think about the fall of great societies, why and how these things happen is important to understand in regards of our own survival. Did they program their absence?
I’ll start with an interesting example of this. Easter Island in the pacific, when we first discovered this place there were no trees on the island, the only island in the pacific without trees. Also large stone statues were found there, the signs of civilization. So what happened to the people there?
Their society thrived on the resource rich environment. They used the wood which came in abundance to make tools for fishing, fires and huts. Eventually as their population grew they ended up cutting down all of the trees on the island. This meant they no longer could make tools for fishing etc. Eventually they ran out of meat and their only source of meat was each other. They turned to war and cannibalism!
I wonder what the islander thought as he was cutting down the last tree, condemning his people to a horrible fate “it’s ok, we have great technology, we can invent a wood alternative” or “I pay my taxes, I’m entitled to this wood!” why didn’t they regulate their consumption of the wood when they had the chance? Is it because they were overpopulated or over reliant on the wood? Not particularly because other societies have survived similar deforestation and overcrowding issues.
It was a slow change, one that happened over a number of generations perhaps. The islanders were simply unaware of it happening until it was too late. Or maybe some did know but were making money from the trees and therefore unwilling to change as they had too much to lose. Even hiding the issue; from the rest of the islanders to protect their source of wealth. Also another important point is that they were totally isolated, with no neighbors to call on for help.
Now if I translate the above example into a modern day context. It’s not just that we’re running out of oil but it has a harmful affect on our world by us using it so much. We face massive climate change issues, that threaten us all, but we seem to be doing very little about it, why? Are we programming our absence?
We are programmed from birth! Initially by our parents, then by schools and education, to conform to the society we live in. Everyday we are bombarded by advertising and media, always offering to make our lives easier or better. We may choose to ignore them but they still have an influence over our daily lives. They project an ideal, something that we are supposed to strive for.
Are we programming our absence in this way? Is the media and experience of our daily lives distracting us from the bigger picture? If so why?.. what is the bigger picture?
Our society has been designed specifically for one purpose. To keep the masses subdued and contented, to create a stable, controllable and productive society. Edward Bernays(regarded as the father of public relations) used psychology of the subconscious to manipulate public opinion. He developed ideas on crowd psychology to create a stable and most importantly, controllable society. He believed the general public (the mob) were irrational and couldn't be trusted to make rational decisions and therefore needed to be controlled. His methods, among others, are being used today and with them, we are programming our absence.
We are now so invested in this façade that many of us are completely unaware of its existence or the impact it has on us.
Have you heard of the new world order? This is the plan to create a one world government with an id chipped population. I only heard of this recently, why haven’t we heard about this in the news, why is it not the centre of talks in parliament, when it is massively important and has implications to us all? Quite simply because we are not supposed to know! We have been programmed not to care or even notice. If we did know the whole truth about the state of the world there would probably be mass riots.
Who benefits or profits from this? I couldn’t begin to list themon this blog, only that it is a relatively small group, of extremely powerful, wealthy and secretive people. They operate inside and outside our governments and their tactics are deplorable! They create destruction and chaos in order to sway public opinion to go to war or pass an unjust law that invades our human rights. 9/11, 7/7, the lusitania(was sent into German controlled waters deliberately, even after the Germans warned they would destroy it) are some examples. Terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, Al Qaeda how many times have we heard these words. They use them to program us with fear so we stay indoors and buy things that make us “happy”.
Ossama Bin Laden never once used the words Al Qaeda to describe his terrorist group until after George W Bush. Doesn’t seem like much until you consider who would have to most to gain from having an intelligent, structured, organized and violent enemy (that didn’t exist). After the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks our governments persuaded us into going to war by using deception and fear tactics. War is highly profitable for arms traders, banks and reconstruction groups. The Carlyle Group that George bush is a board member of profits a great deal from the war and the reconstruction demand that it creates afterwards. It also keeps a leader in power because you wouldn’t want to change leaders in the middle of a war.
We have been sold a massive lie one that goes deep into our subconscious to keep us like a herd of sheep. Will we be able to change, in spite of all this, to stop burning fossil fuels and use alternate means of energy? Stop killing each other for money and power and work together for the good of our entire planet. Or will we end up like the Easter islanders? In which case, sadly, we are programming our absence.

Friday 8 February 2008

The absence of location & a merge of presence

Absence. The state of being away from a place or a person. The non-existence or lack of.

If we take 'programming' as a technological entity, I feel that in essence we are programming our absence of location and are causing, and have indeed caused a merge of presence.

The likes of email, the mobile phone and the Internet obviously allow us to be present without being predominantly locative to the source. We are able to access services, communicate and interact with anyone or anything around the world. I find this interesting, there is always the sense of thinking, 'where would be be without mobile devices'; because of our reliance of them, well the answer is, '...anywhere we want!' (surely?).

Looking at technology itself as location, the launch of the iphone and of course other similar mobile-browser technologies has caused an absence, and lack of the usual standardized platforms (such as a PC browser) - which has caused the internet to become portable. We do not need to be present at a physical workstation, instead the portal to the web is mobile.

GPS and its integration of mobile means that we don't actually need to know where we are either- the technology finds us! Take Sat Nav's, is there an element of control here? and an element of reliance almost?

This stuff has become old news, but what is interesting is the rise in need to merge the gap between mobile and a standard browser portal. Sites such as http://mologogo.com/ and http://bliin.com/ rely on an internet technology to communicate on the move, but however they also create a real-time, social, community online that relies on mobility...

Thursday 7 February 2008

General view on "We are programming our absence"


In the sense the quote "we are programming our own absence" relates to one of the points which technology and computers are slowly taking over jobs. This being said a lot of jobs are now being replaced by machinery, such as in factories when repetitive work is needed. Maybe the reason being this was decided was mainly to cut down on employment costs but also one could argue that replacing humans for machinery would help keep a high and consistent quality to products.

Paul Virilo's quote could also be related to all forms of communication regarding how technology is and how it will carry on stretching the boundaries of our already absence in civilisation. There are hundreds of different forms of communication which requires some form of technology but in one sense they all have a similar effect of programming our absence.

For example: Webcams and microphones would replace the need for meeting person to person but instead give the users a visual and voice enabled communication which people can use to contact their friends/family even if they're half way across the world so already there is an absence in human interaction. Also with the big craze of a certain website network called "facebook" which allows users to search other members, leave messages, play games, etc. With the network having such a large list of different functions which lets users interact with each other without having to be there in person leaves little possibilities of human interaction.

At a business level technology is showing signs of technology taking, like smaller companies have opted to rather have all their products be displayed on their website rather than opening a store. For a consumer the advantages of being able to purchase a product at any given time without the inconvenience of store opening/closing times which also relates to how technology is programming our absence.


TBC..